America's North Shore Journal

Supporting the Ninth Amendment

Our Best: Commander Shanti Sethi

FacebookTwitterGoogle+StumbleUponDiggEmailPrint

The Chrome web browser is inserting hyphens for some unknown reason. If you know why or how to fix, drop us a comment, PLEASE! Fixed. Plugin issue. Thanks to commenter jg!!!

Shanti Sethi

Commander Sethi smiles for the camera during a press tour of the ship.\ during a port call in India.

America is truly a wonderful country. Where else would you find a female Navy officer from Reno, Nevada, commanding the destroyer USS Decatur? Did I mention that she is of South Asian origin? Oh, and let us not forget that she is a graduate of the nation’s oldest private military academy, Norwich.

Commander Shanti Sethi joined the U.S. Navy in 1994. She has worked her way up, serving in various positions at sea and on shore.

In mid March, her ship made a port call in Chennai, India. The Indian media were quick to recognize the success of a daughter of their nation and the visit received a great deal of publicity.

The Decatur has a Facebook page.

Commander Sethi blogs at a site called Adventures in Paradise. Her Twitter account is @ShantiRae.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+StumbleUponDiggEmailPrint

43 Comments

  1. Most likely she is just one more affirmative action baby. Its no secret that from the federal level to the local level ALL areas of government have had AA policies for many decades.

    Military quotas for promotions of minorities and women have existed for decades. The military is absolutely RIFE with political correctness. Take a look at Major Hassan for instance. I wonder how many better qualified white men were discriminated against/passed over for promotion time and time again so “Commander” Sethi could make feminists/women feel all warm and fuzzy. I have no good patriotic or good thoughts about this at all as its just one more symptom of the PC/liberal sickness that is rotting out many of our great institutions.

    1. Reread the comments. People who have worked with her have told us she is more than qualified for the post. Please set aside your bigotry and recognize that women are also contributing to the defense of the United States and many do so in ways that exceed many of their male compatriots. This category “Our Best” is dedicated to showcasing the women of the U.S. military and the good work they are doing every day.

  2. Congrats Commander. I served with Oilking Jim on DDG-31 from 67 to 71. I know you will continue to have the Decatur serve us proud. Jerry, Jefferson City, Missouri

  3. Moe Lane: Spend a little time outside the rah-rah right-liberal echo chamber, you might be surprised to find that rational people can have opinions different from yours.

    Chuck: You are deliberately and dishonestly conflating two very different things. Colonists are not immigrants. Colonists built this country. Immigrants came to a country that already existed. The switchover from primarily colonists to primarily immigrants happened in the latter half of the 19th century, and prior to then, what immigrants that were coming were primarily of the same ethnic nature as the people already present. This “we’re all immigrants” is one of the more common liberal lies and it is high time it was retired.

    Shanti’s Mom: Thank you for your clarifications regarding her birth. You have put your finger on the fundamental issue here: what IS an American? Is it “anybody in the world who wants to get here and does”? Is it “anybody who happens to be born in the right geographical area”? Is it “anybody with citizenship papers”? If we pass an amnesty, does that immediately turn all the Mexican illegals into Americans, and make their barrios and shantytowns American normal, and make Spanish a mainstream American language? Would the people who created this country “for ourselves and our posterity” agree with that outcome? Is a third-generation Muslim Arab in the housing projects of Paris or London a Frenchman or an Englishman?

    It is certainly possible for immigrant peoples to become American, to mix into and disappear in the broader population. An immigrant marries a native, their children marry other natives, by the third generation the results are indistinguishably American. This is what happens with French, or Russians, or Swedes who come here. It is precisely what is not happening with other groups. Why did these two Indian immigrants marry another Indian, instead of an American? Why did they name their daughter Shanti instead of Susan or Jennifer? Obviously because they LIKE being Indian. It is their identity, they want to retain it. They chose to remain Indian, rather than become American – but they still want the papers and benefits of being American. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

    The liberal answer at this point is that OF COURSE they can still be Indian while also being American, because the two don’t conflict. Because being an Indian – or a Mexican, or Vietnamese, or Nigerian – applies only on levels that American identity does not. And this is only possible when American national identity, as such, doesn’t exist.

    1. “Colonists are not immigrants. Colonists built this country. Immigrants came to a country that already existed.”

      This is inane. The American colonists formed a pre-Industrial Revolution, 13-state nation clinging to the Eastern seaboard. Today’s America – the most powerful nation that has ever existed – was built by both the descendants of those colonists and immigrants.

      As for tomorrow’s America, most of our future engineers and scientists will be of Indian and Chinese descent, since the descendants of those colonists increasingly turn away from science and technology.

      “Why did these two Indian immigrants marry another Indian, instead of an American?”

      Some don’t. The Indians are a fairly new immigrant presence in the US, and the second and third generations are, in fact, increasingly marrying non-Indians in the US.

      But I get the feeling you might have a problem with that, too.

      “Why did they name their daughter Shanti instead of Susan or Jennifer?”

      Because Shanti is a perfectly acceptable American name – and it’s increasingly being used by Americans not of Indian descent. “Susan” and “Jennifer” weren’t names created in America – they were imported by immigrants. Now, so is “Shanti”.

      1. “But I get the feeling you might have a problem with that, too.”

        It’s always been interesting to me how liberals can draw a conclusion from someone’s words that directly contradicts what those words clearly say.

        “and it’s increasingly being used by Americans not of Indian descent.”

        I would be _extremely_ interested in seeing some specific statistical data, broken down along national origin, to this effect.

        I will state up front that I do not believe such data, supporting your claim, exists. 

        As for “importing” the other names by immigrants, this is another deliberately false statement.  It was not an import because those names were part of the existing culture of the first dozen or so generations to live in and create the fabric of this society.  They did not pick and choose among cultures, they took what they had from their parents and continued it.  That is what formed the basic nature of the initial American culture and people up until first the Irish immigration (which was however still from the British isles) and then from other parts of Europe in the late 19th century, and what they fought wars to set upon a firm foundation.  “Import” is, again, bringing something form elsewhere to a place that already exists.  There were no pre-existing settlements and folkways to “import” such things as names into, it was the default.  It didn’t occur to them that they should be picking and choosing national identities; they had one already, they were quite satisfied with it – and they were convinced it was the best in the world.

  4. I thank Sethi-ji for her service to our country. If she were my daughter I would be bursting with pride – congratulations!

  5. Affirmative action stigmatizes the competent because observers can no longer assume that people have achieved their status by being appraised for promotion on the basis of merit. Look at Shuttle Astronaut, Lisa Nowak’s rocket ride up the career ladder via affirmative action.

    Commander Shanti Sethi is a woman and a person who belongs to a racial group which is a minority in the US and especially so in the military. The presence of outreach programs designed to promote such people put Commander Shanti Sethi in an awkward position. Either she is the beneficiary of favoritism or she is not. If she is, the the skepticism of her competence and rise to rank are warranted. If she did not benefit from these programs then the skepticism is unwarranted and unfair to her. The public can accept one of two default assumptions – AA-type policies do not advance less meritorious people or they do. If these policies did not give a boost to people of lessor merit then they’d be completely unnecessary but they do in fact exist, therefore it is quite defensible to presume that some of the people who are promoted were promoted over more qualified people.

    It’s not out of line to wonder whether dual standards have worked to the benefit of Commander Shanti Sethi.

    The solution to the problem of stigmatizing the competent is to do away with programs which advance the relatively incompetent.

  6. It is not a stupid question to ask “How many ship battles were won by women”. Yes, until recently they could not be. Why is that? If women are such awesome warrors and warship captains, how could men possibly keep them down?

    Is is discrimination or natural selection? Very few women are interested in war and warfighting, and they don’t have the psychological makeup for it. How do we know? Look at every army in the world in all of world history. For every Joan of Arc, we have thousands of General Pattons. Turn on Band of Brothers the next time you are in a room full of women and men- the different reactions are real, and real telling.

  7. Thank you Chuck.

    Shanti was honored to be on the first crew of the USS Hopper (DDG 70), named for Adm. Grace Hopper. She was the navigator when the Hopper steamed into San Francisco Bay for the commissioning of the ship. How awesome to watch a ship “brought to life”. It brought tears to my eyes and made me proud to be an American.

  8. I guess I should add that I was born a U.S. citizen and her father, originally from India, was also a U.S. citizen.

    1. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site. I appreciate your comments, and hope they will kill off the thread about your daughter’s ethnicity.

      All my ancestors were immigrants to America, though some were here in 1640. Most of the rest of you qualify as newcomers, so quit fussing about the subject.

      My lovely wife also chooses to remind you all of Admiral Grace Hopper, a female officer that made great contribution to the U.S. and the Navy.

  9. Please allow me to clarify one thing:

    After 33 hours of hard labor at St. Mary’s Hospital in Reno, NV, I can attest to the fact that Commander Shanti R. Sethi was, in fact, born a U.S. citizen.

    Both of my children were raised to believe that they could do/be anything they wanted to be if they were willing to work hard for it. Shanti and her brother both took that to heart and have worked hard to be successful in life.

    I find it very sad that people who have never met her would assume that she didn’t earn her rank and position. Be thankful that people like her are willing to risk everything for the freedom we oft times take for granted.

  10. Actually, Rollory has a good point though he has presented it in such an inflammatory way as to make me suspect trolling.

    I dearly hope Commander Sethi is fully qualified for command for the sake of her ship and our country. However, the navy has promoted unqualified women in the past for political reasons which unfortunately tarnishes all women in the Navy who have high profile positions. It’s incredibly unfair to them but it’s the PC nutjobs who are to blame.

  11. Smarty. I oppose affirmative action as well, and beleive promotion should be based strictly on merit. But I think you go too far in automatically making the assumption she is unqualified.
    Despite the examples you cited, the US military has a pretty good track record of promoting based on merit. They desegrated, and promoted blacks based on merit before it was popular.
    And they were often criticised by liberals when they continued to promote based on merit, even after affirmative action demands. In fact, if the comment by Former SRO is true, it sounds like she is qualified.

    As for how many female ship captains won battles, it is a pretty stupid question, since until recently no females could become ship captains. Although there were a few female pirates, like Anne Bonny, who were often more capable than the men they served with.

    To Rollery:
    If she is an American citizen, she is an American. That is one of the main improvements of America over Europe. Our nationality is not based on blood and soil, but on beleiving in the idea of America, and following our constitution. That is why America was able to assimilate millions of immigrants, from all over the world, and turn them into Americans that are just as patriotic and productive as those descended from the Mayflower.

    The only point on which I might agree with nativists like you is in favoring assimilation over multiculturism. You should not become a US citisen, unless you are ready to embrace US culture, and learn our language. That does not mean you must abandon your own, but if the 2 cultures conflict, then you must be willing to let US culture take precedence. All the immigrant groups that succeeded, like Irish, Italians, Asians, etc, did this. Most Hispanics did as well, but with encouragement from some radical hispanic identity groups, some did not, and they are failing because of it.

Comments are closed.

America's North Shore Journal © 2014 Frontier Theme