Subscribe in a reader

An on-line magazine supporting the Ninth Amendment


Clinton Confused, Conning Us

Patterico fisks Bill Clinton. He makes him cry like a girly-man. No, really.

Clinton’s answer to Chris Wallace on Fox was an accusation of unfair treatment. True, no hummer for Bill in the Fox green room. The accusation was that Wallace was asking Clinton questions that he had not asked the Bush administration.

Patterico demonstrates the falsity of that contention.

That may technically be true. If you simply plug the terms “U.S.S. Cole” and “Fox News Sunday” into a Nexis search engine, it may well be the case that Bush officials were not asked specifically about the response to the Cole. But that wasn’t Wallace’s question. Wallace had simply mentioned the Cole as part of a detailed question about terror acts that occurred on Clinton’s watch, culminating in a question asking why Clinton hadn’t done more — the same question Wallace asked Rumsfeld in 2004.

Lot’s more at the link.


Subscribe to America's North Shore Journal Subscribe



Comments

Comments are closed.