On Thursday, November 19, and Saturday, November 21, 2009, I spent about five hours each day working as a volunteer at a vaccination clinic run by the Monroe County Public Health Department (DPH). It was one of five each day held to vaccinate at risk groups for pandemic H1N1, the Swine Flu. I worked at the one held at the former Medley Center Mall in Irondequoit.

The DPH did a great job publicizing the clinics, with the cooperation of the local media. Attendance on Thursday was somewhat overwhelming, while that on Saturday was more even in flow.

The DPH contracted with private companies for the actual vaccine administration. DPH personnel and volunteers were used for crowd control.

The observations in this piece apply only to the location I worked at, unless otherwise stated.

The Mall is empty. That meant no heat either day, and somewhat uneven hallway lighting. It also meant sparse sanitary facilities, and the men’s room had been damaged by vandalism prior to the clinic. In fact, it was flooded on Saturday. The Irondequoit Kiwanis had coffee and donuts earlier on Thursday and through about 2 on Saturday. There were no other sources for food and drink in the Mall.

On Thursday, there were four to six people giving the vaccines at any one time. The private contractors made sure that they got all their breaks in. In the late afternoon there were some 400 people in line, and a four hour wait. I was told by DPH staff that the holdup was that the providers were having to answered questions. While that may have been the case, it was clear that there were far too few providers for the demand.

Just before 5 p.m. we were told to refuse entry to any additional patients, even though the clinic had been advertised as open until 8 p.m. Most people took the news with some grace, though several self-important individuals chose to create a problem.

I had begun work at 2:30. Throughout the afternoon it was obvious that the five clinics did not seem to be talking to each other. We were getting news from patients who had been turned away from other clinics and came to the Mall. We were not the first clinic to close its doors, as far as I can determine.

On Saturday, some changes had been made. There were now about eight to ten providers, and a separate line for people with children. We were given handouts to provide patients that would answer many of the common questions.

We closed at six on the dot. During the time I was working, there were no lines beyond the clinic area, and the only real wait was in the children’s line in the clinic, perhaps 15 minutes.

Both days, we took patients with movement or other issues straight to the clinic, about 50 yards from the Mall entrance, rather than ask them to make the much longer trek around to the clinic entrance. Even then, the distance was a little daunting for some.

Signage was poor. There were two manufactured signs, one that said “Clinic here” and another that gave the target groups for the clinic. The remaining signs were made on a computer, did not last well in the rain on Thursday and did not look at all professional.

We had no handouts on Thursday and ran out of the handouts on Saturday.

Far too many adults over 65 came. Whether they thought it was the seasonal flu vaccination or not, I do not know. The clinic was not intended for them and those doses could have gone to more at-risk populations. The only people turned away had valid medical reasons for the denial, such as an allergy to eggs or being ill with a fever.

On Thursday, the clinic closed before the hour advertised. There seemed to be no interest on the part of the DPH staff in continuing to give vaccinations while they had demand.

The Monroe County DPH has about 239 employees. It would seem logical that the department would be able to staff these clinics without volunteers from other county departments and from the public. In fact, other departments did have volunteers there, and those county employees will receive comp time for the hours that they worked past their normal quitting time.

Most of the public probably is not aware that clinics like this have been planned and discussed for years, as the potential for bioterrorism arose. A great deal of time and effort has been devoted to the problem of dispensing vaccinations to a large population in a short period of time. Sites have been selected, and plans made. I cannot determine if the clinic I participated in was the result of this planning. If so, a lot of people wasted their time in the last seven years.

Why was it necessary to use contractors to give the vaccinations? The DPH employs many people with the training and qualifications to give injections. They also have, in their plans for this eventuality, other groups of people they could have called upon, such as paramedics or hospital staffs.

Why were volunteers needed? The DPH had a couple hundred employees at work on Thursday who could have worked at a clinic. Those same employees could have been used on Saturday, as well. If it was all about overtime pay or union contracts, then just how would the clinics have worked if smallpox had been used in a terrorist attack as all of those folks planned for?

Thursday was cold and rainy. Saturday was cold. I kinda resent being cold and wet while DPH secretaries sat in warm offices and surfed the Web. If the department charged with preserving and protecting public health in Monroe County cannot generate an “all hands” response for a project like the Swine Flu vaccine clinics, I have to wonder just what they would do in a more serious situation.

The Irondequoit clinic vaccinated many, many people in the hours that I worked. In that respect, it achieved its goals. More clinics are being discussed for December.

For the future clinics to be successful, there must be:

• More communication among the sites
• Site locations suitable for large crowds, to include heat, lighting, bathrooms and refreshments
• More communication with the media, especially when it comes to closing sites early
• Professional signage – it can be reused
• a perception that the Monroe County Department of Public Health, as an organization, takes the matter seriously

New York State follows the example of the CDC and its reporting is at least a week behind at any given time. In the week ending November 7 2009, flu activity continued to explode in upstate New York.

New York State is reporting the level of this pandemic in several ways. In labs statewide for the week ending November 7, over 4,000 specimens tested positive for the A flu virus, 99% of those testing positive for flu. At the state laboratory, 43 of 45 specimens tested positive for Swine Flu.

The state is also tracking visits to hospital emergency departments for influenza like illnesses (ILI). In the Western Region, including the cities of Buffalo, Rochester, Corning and Elmira, the rate was 19.8% of all emergency department visits. This was a 10% increase from the preceding week and a new peak for the year.

The Central New York Region, including the large military base at Fort Drum and the cities of Syracuse and Binghamton had a 19.1% ILI rate. That is an 8% increase from the preceding week and a new peak for the year.

The Capital Region is the area with the highest reported ILI visit rate in the state, 22.5%. That is a 15% percent increase from the previous week and nearly double the rate from two week prior.

The Hudson Valley Region and Long Island have much lower rates though the Hudson Valley is now just above a 10% rate. During the Spring wave of Swine Flu, this region reached a peak of 14% of visits to emergency departments for ILI.

First, the latest on the Ukraine:

17 November 2009 — Preliminary tests reveal no significant changes in the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus based on investigations of samples taken from patients in Ukraine. Analyses are being performed by two WHO influenza collaborating centres as part of the global influenza surveillance network.

Preliminary genetic sequencing shows that the virus is similar to the virus used for production of the pandemic influenza vaccine, reconfirming the vaccine’s efficacy at this time.

Additional questions about the pandemic virus circulating in Ukraine will be answered as more data is available.

WHO commends the government of Ukraine for its open sharing of samples to inform global monitoring of the virus for signs of change.

A total of 34 samples were analysed independently by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Mill Hill in London, UK, and the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control of Influenza in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

WHO

As of 8 November 2009, worldwide more than 206 countries and overseas territories or communities have reported laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009, including over 6250 deaths.

As many countries have stopped counting individual cases, particularly of milder illness, the case count is likely to be significantly lower than the actual number of cases that have occurred. WHO is actively monitoring the progress of the pandemic through frequent consultations with the WHO Regional Offices and member states and through monitoring of multiple sources of data.

The winter influenza season, which began unusually early across much of the Northern Hemisphere, shows early signs of peaking in parts of North America but is intensifying across much of Europe and Central and Eastern Asia.

In North America, Canada reported sharp increases in rates of influenza-like-illness (ILI), detections of pandemic H1N1 virus, and school outbreaks over the past three weeks as pandemic activity continues to spread west to east. In the United States, influenza transmission remains geographically widespread and intense but largely unchanged since the previous reporting week; rates of hospitalizations among persons aged 0-4 years, 5-17 years, and 18-49 years have now exceeded those seen during recent previous influenza seasons. Disease activity may have peaked in the earlier affected southern and south eastern parts of the United States. In Mexico, influenza activity remains geographically widespread with a significant wave of cases reported since early September, most notably from central and southern Mexico.

In Europe and Central Asia, overall influenza transmission continues to intensify throughout the continent as pandemic activity spreads eastward. At least 10 countries of Western Europe (Iceland, Poland, Romania, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) now report that the proportion of sentinel samples testing positive for influenza exceeded 20% consistent with active circulation of pandemic influenza viruses. High to very high intensity of respiratory diseases with concurrent circulation of pandemic H1N1 2009 was also reported in the Netherlands, Italy, much of Northern Europe, Belarus, Bulgaria, and in the Russian Federation (particularly in the Urals). Disease activity may be peaking in a few countries, notably Iceland, Ireland, and parts of the UK (Northern Ireland) that experienced intense transmission during early autumn. Because of a sharp rise in pandemic influenza cases one week ago in Ukraine, the Ministry of Health requested assistance from WHO European Regional Office to evaluate and respond. The initial analysis of information indicates that the numbers of severe cases do not appear to be excessive when compared to the experience of other countries and do not represent any change in the transmission or virulence of the virus.

Over 99% of subtyped influenza A viruses in the Europe were pandemic H1N1 2009 with the exception of the Russian Federation where <10% of viruses subtyped were seasonal influenza subtypes, H3N2 and seasonal H1N1.

In Western Asia, increasing activity has been observed in several countries. In Israel, sharp increases in rates of ILI and pandemic virus detections have been observed over the past 3 weeks. In Afghanistan, the proportion of sentinel visits for acute respiratory infections (ARI) has increased over the past 3-4 weeks, but more dramatically in the last 1-2 weeks.

In East Asia, very intense and increasing influenza activity continues to be reported in Mongolia with a severe impact on the healthcare system. In China, the proportion of sentinel hospital visits for ILI and the proportions of respiratory samples testing positive for influenza, continued to increase over the past 3-4 weeks. More than 80% of influenza viruses isolated in China were pandemic H1N1 2009. In Hong Kong SAR, rates of ILI have returned baseline after a recent wave of predominantly pandemic H1N1 influenza in September and October. In Japan, sharp increases in influenza activity continue to be reported nationally. On northern island of Hokkaido, which to date has been the most heavily affected, disease activity may have recently peaked.

Although active, predominantly pandemic influenza transmission persists in the Caribbean region, disease activity may have recently peaked in some places as evidenced by recently declining rates of ARI and severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) in the Caribbean Epidemiology Centre (CAREC) countries. Most other countries in the tropical region of Central and South America continue to report declining influenza activity.

With the exception of Nepal and Sri Lanka, overall transmission continues to decline in most parts of South and Southeast Asia.

In the temperate region of the southern hemisphere, little pandemic influenza activity has been reported in recent weeks. Of note, a cluster of pandemic influenza cases been reported in Argentina in the capital area.

WHO

Europe:

Seventeen countries have reported increases in influenza-like illness (ILI) and/or ARI consultations (defined as countries with increases in the previous three weeks). These increases are particularly notable in the group aged 5–14 years. In eight of these countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden), the positivity rate of sentinel swab specimens exceeded 20% (minimum number of tested sentinel specimens: 20).

The intensity of clinical activity was described as very high in Norway, Sweden, Bulgaria and the Republic of Moldova for the first time. Other countries reporting continued very high intensity this week were Iceland, Ireland and the Russian Federation (Urals region and far eastern region). Eight countries/regions described high clinical activity: Belarus, Finland, Kazakhstan, Poland, Russian Federation (central, north-western, Siberian and Volga region), Turkey, Ukraine and Northern Ireland. The clinical incidence of ILI and/or ARI was reported as widespread in 19 countries. The Republic of Moldova reported very high intensity, widespread clinical incidence and severe impact of influenza on health services. Impact was reported as moderate in nine countries, including Ukraine, and low in 17 others.

EuroFlu

The CDC continues to release data on Fridays for the previous week. The data in this report is for the week ending November 7 and was released November 13, 2009.

Click for larger image

1. Visits to doctors for influenza like illness: second week that rates have declined. Now 6.7% and the seasonal baseline is 2.3%. Note, however, that many doctors are telling patients who call with ILI symptoms not to come in to the office unless it is serious.
2. Hospitalizations for lab confirmed influenza: still climbing.
3. Deaths from pneumonia and influenza: still increasing.
4. 46 states report widespread flu activity. That is down two states since the last weekly report.
5. Virus typing continues to find nearly all specimens are pandemic H1N1, swine flu.

Click for larger image

Click for larger image

Don’t miss my television interview on the Time Warner local new channel, YNN. I was asked to counterpoint the county medical society president.

Is the Vaccine Production Process Broken?